SW Arkansas Times

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) has withdrawn a proposed regulation that aimed to impose new speed limits on smaller vessels along the Atlantic coast. This decision follows consistent pressure from various committee members who expressed concerns about the economic impact of such regulations.

House Committee on Natural Resources Chairman Bruce Westerman commented, "In the dying days of his administration, the Biden administration is finally taking action to withdraw their extremely misguided and burdensome vessel speed restriction." He criticized the proposal as flawed and anticipates a return to science-based policies under the Trump administration.

Vice Chairman Rob Wittman shared his perspective as a fisherman, stating, "I was alarmed by the Biden-Harris administration’s attempt to expand unnecessary speed restrictions... I’m thrilled to see this misguided federal regulation withdrawn."

Sam Graves, Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, expressed relief at NOAA's decision. He remarked, "Thankfully, NOAA chose to withdraw the North Atlantic right whale speed limit rule," emphasizing hopes for more reasonable solutions in maritime regulations.

U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter described the proposed rule as overreaching and harmful without environmental benefits. He suggested using tracking technologies instead.

Rep. Russell Fry labeled NOAA's proposal as an attempt to advance an environmental agenda without merit. U.S. Rep. Jen Kiggans echoed these sentiments, noting potential economic devastation in coastal Virginia had the rule been implemented.

Greg Murphy voiced strong opposition against what he termed an unscientific rule pushed by the Biden Administration despite evidence against its necessity for protecting right whales.

David Rouzer welcomed NOAA's withdrawal of what he called a misguided rule based on assumptions that could have jeopardized livelihoods in Southeastern North Carolina.

NOAA's initial proposal sought to amend existing rules by extending speed restrictions to boats 35 feet or longer and expanding management areas while changing safety exemptions. Critics highlighted potential economic impacts including risks to 340,000 jobs and $84 billion in contributions due to canceled boating activities.

The withdrawal returns policy focus towards balancing local community interests with marine conservation efforts through science-based approaches.